ArticleFumbling in the dark
The renewable energy sector is suffering due to rifts between the AEPC and donors
The Alternative Energy Promotion Centre (AEPC), Nepal’s apex government body for the promotion of renewable energy, turned 20 this month. How the AEPC managed to provide improved cooking and lighting solutions 3.6 million households in a span of two decades is something that should earn it praise and applause. However, unbeknownst to many, the institution is also riddled with rifts and complications. Lately, there has been a serious split with a few of its donors. This break-up is not devoid of drama, lies, distrust and conspiracies. If the issue is not resolved quickly, severe damage will be caused to this new industry in Nepal that was instituted by decades of service and hard work of many professionals, renewable energy advocates, private sector organisations, civil society organisations, multiple well-wishers and development partners.
In June last year, the Ministry of Finance received an angry letter from the Embassy of Denmark saying that it was freezing its funding to the National Rural and Renewable Energy Programme (NRREP)—a $170-million renewable energy undertaking—citing lack of progress on the AEPC’s part to do something about the formation of cartels by solar companies. A number of private firms had formed a cartel and were forcing consumers to buy high-priced large systems. This problem cannot be fixed by enforcing compliance control or imposing penalties. It needs systemic intervention. The AEPC and the donors should have reflected upon their own modus operandi and fixed it first. However, the easiest option the donors chose was to freeze their funding and wait to see how the AEPC would deal with the problem.
This action that brought the whole sector to a screeching halt has left many baffled. While I don’t question the donors’ intention to clear the mess before it spread further, I am equally of the opinion that it was one of their most irresponsible and unethical decisions to distance themselves from a problem that they partly helped create. It would be wrong to place all the blame on the AEPC. As the donors started imposing a series of audits and compliance orders, things became more complex as it started unearthing other lapses one after another. This created a huge burden on the weak AEPC bureaucracy which is already hindered by political meddling and internal rifts.
All the field work and installations came to a complete halt as the AEPC attempted to respond to the donors’ requirements. The AEPC couldn’t even spend the resources provided by the state and lenient donors. And something else not seen in the renewable energy sector ever before started unfolding. Some donors took micro meddling too far under the veil of advisor assistance and began interfering in the state’s affairs in the name of making their aid more effective. This led to a new division of opinion among the donors themselves. The harsh truth is that a whole year was spent on negotiations with not a single technology installed, making it the darkest year in the history of renewables in Nepal.
How ethical is it for the donors to take
credit for the successes of the past and blame the AEPC for the mess for which they are partly responsible? What is equally strange is the profound lack of empathy as shown by their blocking of all services when the whole country had been traumatised by the killer quake and the Indian blockade, and all that the people wanted was basic energy solutions.
This issue of unethical dealing in solar installations not only became a dominant issue in the sector, it later also served as a major reference for the revision of Subsidy Policy 2016. It is probably one of the costliest policy revision exercises ever held in Nepal considering the fact that it was prepared at the cost of blocking all renewable
energy services for an entire year. However, the fate of this policy is still unknown as the debate does not look like ending
anytime soon. This is not a past issue that I am talking about. Compliance negotiations are still going on between the AEPC, donors and private sector with no realisation of what they are getting themselves into. No surprise that the AEPC today outsources more accountants and auditors than technicians and engineers.
The fact is that there seems to be serious problems at both ends of the spectrum. The broader problem is that the donors have been constantly denying their role in bringing the institution to this mess and want the AEPC alone to take the responsibility. Donors, I hope you are listening. We know that the Nepali bureaucracy has serious lapses, corruption is flourishing and unethical dealings by private companies are rampant. And, like you, we too do not want our taxpayer money to be misused by greedy bureaucrats or pocketed by any unethical private firm. But, in the name of controls and compliances, your requirements should not become another burden on the weak bureaucracy instead of helping it to reform.
We agree that there seems to be a gross problem in the AEPC’s ability to handle these new challenges and the complexity of the issue of subsidy misappropriation, but in the name of good governance and aid effectiveness, donor micro meddling and high-handedness without accepting their own role in creating the mess is equally dangerous. It does not earn them a good
reputation either. This current myopia of believing that short-term compliance orders can solve the problem without understanding the systemic lapses in the design and structure of the NRREP will merely be a zero-sum blame game. This toxic conflict which threatens to paralyse the growth of the entire sector should not be prolonged. Donors, I hope you are listening.
- Kandel is an energy policy expert
Source: Ekantipurcomments powered by Disqus
Interview+ View All
‘तामाकोसी–३ एनआरएनकै लगानीमा निर्माण गर्न प्रयास गर्छु’: भवन भट्ट
पूर्वाधार विकास, पर्यटन तथा वित्तीय क्षेत्रमा बढी जोड दिएको छु । काठमाडौं–हेटौंडा सुरुङमार्गमा मेरो संलग्नता छ । यसलाई निर्माण चरणमा पुर्याउनु छ । वित्तीय स्रोत जुट्न नसक्दा यो आयोजना अघि बढ्न सकेको छैन ।
मलाई काम गर्न दिने हो भने अहिलेको मूल्यलाई अझ घटाएरप्राधिकरणलाई नाफा हुने वातावरण बनाउन सक्छु: उर्जा मन्त्रि
यदि मलाई साँच्चिकै काम गर्न दिने हो भने र मेरो गतिलाई पछ्याउने हो भने अहिलेको मूल्यलाई अझ घटाएर विद्युत् प्राधिकरणलाई नाफा हुने वातावरण बनाउन सक्छु । यो प्रकारको कार्ययोजना मसँग छ । सबैभन्दा पहिलो त विद्युत् प्राधिकरणको आम्दानीको १/१ रुपैयाँको हिसाबकिताब हुनुपर्छ ।
झोलामा खोला बोकेर हिड्ने दलालका कारण वास्तविक लगानीकर्ता मारमा परेका छन्: उर्जामन्त्रि महेन्द्रबहादुर शाही
विद्युत बिलिङ प्रविधि पुरानो र परम्परागत छ । अब स्मार्ट मिटर जडान गरेर पुरानो प्रणाली हटाइनेछ । कुन ग्राहकको माग कति हो त्यहीअनुसार वितरण हुन्छ । ग्राहकले बढाउन खोजे आफैँ विद्युत काटिने स्वचालित प्रणाली राखिन्छ । यसमा ग्राहकलाई अभ्यस्ता बनाउँदै जाने हो ।
Article+ View All
जलविद्युतमा विदेशी लगानी
सरकारमा रहनेहरूले कहिले १० वर्षमा १० हजार मेगावाट त कहिले १७ हजार मेगावाट जलविद्युत् उत्पादन गर्ने सुनौला सपना देखाइरहेका छन् । सरकारको पर्याप्त विद्युत्् उत्पादन गर्दै देश उज्यालो पार्ने तथा भारत र अन्य देशमा विद्युत् निर्यात गर्दै वैदेशिकव्यापार घाटा कम गर्ने लक्ष्य पूरा गर्न निकै चुनौतीपूर्ण देखिन्छ।
जलविद्युत् क्षेत्रको ब्रेक थ्रु : माथिल्लो तामाकोसी
माथिल्लो तामाकोसी आयोजना निर्माणपूर्व दुई वटा अध्ययन भएका थिए । २०४१ मा जापान सरकारबाट सुरु गरिएको कोसी नदी जलस्रोत विकास गुरु आयोजनामा टीए–६ नाम दिई १ सय १३ मेगावाट क्षताको आयोजना यसको नजिक पहिचान भएको देखिन्छ ।
वायवीय ऊर्जा र तिनका स्रोत
वैदिक देवतामा मरुद्गणको विशिष्टतम स्थान छ । प्रायः सबै वैदिक संहिताहरूमा उनीहरूका देन र विशेषताबारे धेरथोर चर्चा भेटिन्छन् । तिनमा पनि विशेषगरी ऋग्वेद संहिताको स्थान सर्वाधिक अगाडि देखिएको छ । यस संहितामा मात्रै उनीहरूका प्रशस्ति गान सम्बन्धी कुल ४६ वटा सूक्त रहेका छन् अर्थात् वैदिक देवतामा इन्द्र, अग्नि र अश्विनिकुमारपछि चौथो मर्यादाक्रमको अवस्था हो ।
वातावरणीय सेवाको भुक्तानी कार्यान्वयनका लागि सम्झौता
जलविद्युत् आयोजनामा थेग्रिने समस्यालाई न्यून गर्न वातावरणीय सेवाको भुक्तानी कार्यक्रमको प्रभावकारी कार्यन्वयन गर्न एक सम्झौतापत्रमा आज हस्ताक्षर भएको छ । मस्र्याङ्दी जलाधार क्षेत्रका जलविद्युत् प्रर्वद्धकहरुको सञ्जाल र मस्र्याङ्दी वातावरणीय सेवा व्यवस्थापन सञ्जालले कार्यक्रम कार्यान्वयनका लागि उक्त सम्झौता...
China’s Belt and Road Initiative: Prospects and Pitfalls
Chinese President Xi Jinping initially mooted the idea of Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) and 21st century Maritime Silk Road (MSR) during his visits to Kazakhstan and Indonesia in September and October, 2013, respectively. Subsequently, the two projects together came to be known as ‘One Belt One Road’ (OBOR) Initiative.